Electricity Policy

Wed05242017

Last updateThu, 16 Mar 2017 7pm

ISSN 2331-1223  Twitter

Merger Denied: Now What?

scales

 By Scott Hempling

If the competition to buy a utility were first a competition to better serve the customer, the customers’ benefit would not be net zero as it commonly is. It would reflect what the winner had to offer to beat out its competitors. 

 

S

ince the modern electricity merger trend started in the mid-1980s, state commissions have approved nearly 100 electric utility acquisitions.  I have addressed this trend with a series of essays—sketches for a book I will complete in 2017.  The first essay (“Utility Mergers:  Who Has a Vision?”) introduced the problem.  Because mergers of monopolies are not disciplined by competitive market forces, regulatory policies must align merging companies' interests with the public interest.  They don't.  When no state has a clear vision for its corporate structure future, we get results that no one intended.  Consolidation among investor-owned utilities has reduced their number by half, while leaving many of our local utilities owned by conglomerates.  Electric utilities are no longer your grandparents’ nest eggs, removing a historically important option for conservative investors (and therefore a source of low-cost capital of benefit to consumers). 

Click here to view article as fully-formatted PDF file.

Subscriber only content (beyond "Read More") may be accessed by logging in from the button below or by subscribing HERE.

Log in

Login to your account

Username *
Password *
Remember Me
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Rating 0.00 (0 Votes)

You must be subscribed to post comments. Please go to the Subscribe page to become a subscriber. Free trial subscribers may have limited comment ability. Full-feature subscribers will be able to use all comment features.